OUR CASE RESULTS

A TRACK RECORD OF SUCCESS

Below are some of the results of Joseph L. Jordan, Attorney at Law, a military criminal defense attorney who serves active servicemen nationwide. Please be aware that your case result is not guaranteed. The case results on the following pages are examples of cases that Mr. Jordan has won for his clients. To see how Mr. Jordan can help with your unique case matter, please contact him right away.

Filter by Category

BOI – BOARD OF INQUIRY – ALL CHARGES DISMISSED, RETAINED!

Assault – Article 128 – Administrative Separation Action – Sheppard Air Force Base – No Basis To Seperate – RETAINED!

Counter Productive Leadership– Military Adverse Administrative Action- Board of Inquiry (Show Cause Board) U.S. Army v. 0-4 – Fort Hood – No Basis to Separate – RETAINED!

Domestic Violence– Military Adverse Administrative Action- Board of Inquiry (Show Cause Board U.S. Army v. WO1 – Fort Sill – No Basis to Separate – RETAINED!

Sexual Assault – Military Adverse Administrative Action- Administrative Separation Board (U.S. Army v. E-3 – Fort Hood – No Basis to Separate – RETAINED!)

Attempted Sex with a Minor– Article 120, Article 80 – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Army v. E-3; Fort Drum)

Child Sexual Assault – Article 120 – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Army v. E-8; Fort Leonard Wood)

Sexual Assault – Article 120 – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Air Force v. E-6; Whiteman AFB)

Sexual Assault – Article 120 – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Marine Corps v. E-3; Okinawa)

Sexual Assault – Article 120- NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Army v. CPT; Fort Hood)

Assault – Domestic Violence – Administrative Separation Action – Germany (U.S. Army v. LT (0-2))

BOI – Board of Inquiry – NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED! (U.S. Army v. CDR, USN)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED! (U.S. Army v. LTC)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – Sexual Assault – NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED! U.S. Air Force v. LTC – Wright Patterson AFB

Administrative Separation Board (U.S. Army v. E-6 – Fort Leonard Wood)

9 Victim Case, FULL AQUITTAL! NOT GUILTY!!! (U.S. Air Force v. 0-2E)

Military Sexual Assault – Charge (Article 120, Sexual Assault) – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Army v. E-2)

Military Sexual Assault – Charges (Article 120 – Sexual Assault, Article 80 – Conspiracy) – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Army v. E-3)

General Military Crimes – Charges (Article 92, Article 108, Article 121) – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Air Force v. TSgt)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED!! (U.S. Army v. MAJ)

Fraternization, Administrative Separation Board– RETAINED!! (E-4 – Fort Hood)

Fraud, False Official Statement, Administrative Separation Board– RETAINED!! (E-6 – Fort Hood)

Domestic Violence, Article 128 – CASE DISMISSED! (E-6 – Fort Hood)

Military Sexual Assault Case Result – Patrick Space Force Base – E-4

Military Sexual Assault, Article 120 – CASE DISMISSED! (E-3 – Langly AFB)

Military Sexual Assault, Article 120 – CASE DISMISSED! (E-3 – Sheppard AFB)

Military Sexual Assault, Article 120 – CASE DISMISSED! (E-8 – Barksdale AFB)

Court Martial, Rape, Military Sexual Assault, Article 120 – Full Acquittal, Not Guilty! (E-2 – Fort Sill)

Military Sexual Assault Case Result – Fort Hood (E-4)

Court Martial, Military Sexual Assault, Article 120 – Full Acquittal, Not Guilty! (E-7 – Fort Hood)

Military Sexual Assault, Adverse Administrative Separation Board, No Basis to Separate (US v SSG, Eglin AFB, 7th Special Forces Group)

Court Martial, Sexual Assault, Article 120 – Case Dismissed! Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

Failing to Comply with Depot Order & Engaging in an Inappropriate Relationship with a Polee – Article 92 & 93a (U.S. Marine Corps v. E-5)

Wrongful Drug Use – Article 112a – Wrongful Ingestion of a Controlled Substance – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Navy v. E-4)

Court Martial – Sex Assault of a Minor – Article 120b – FULL ACQUITTAL! NOT GUILTY! (E-5 – Fort Hood Texas)

Court Martial – Military Sexual Assault – NO PUNITIVE DISCHARGE! NO RANK REDUCTION! (US Marines v. E-5)

Discharge Upgrade Request – Discharge Review Board – UPGRADED TO HONORABLE! (U.S. Army v. E-2)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – HONORABLE DISCHARGE RECOMMENDATION (US Army v. Warrant Officer – Fort Hood, Texas)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (US ARMY V. MAJ – Fort Hood, Texas)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (US Army v. CPT – West Point)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (U.S. ARMY V. MAJOR – Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (US Army v. CW2 – Baumholder, Germany)

BOI – Sex Assault – Military Sexual Assault – Board of Inquiry – NOT GUILTY! RETAINED! (U.S. Army v. 0-2 – Fort Moore (Fort Benning), Georgia)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (US Army v. CW2 – Fort Hood, Texas)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (US Army V. CW2 – Fort Hood, Texas)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. CPT – Army Reserves, Texas)

Wrongful Use of Controlled Substance, Tampering with Urinalysis – General Military Crimes (US Army v. E-6 – Fort Carson,Colorado)

Unprofessional Relationship – General Military Crimes – NO PUNITIVE ACTION (US Air Force vs. E8 – Tucson, Arizona)

Larceny – General Military Crimes – NO CHARGES (US Army v. E-6 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Larceny – General Military Crimes – RESOLVED (United States Coast Guard v. E3 – US Coast Guard Station San Juan, Puerto Rico)

Article 112a – General Military Crimes – 1 YEAR OF CONFINEMENT ADJUGED (US Air Force v. E-4 – Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska)

AWOL – General Military Crimes – SENTENCE REDUCTION (U.S. Army v. E-3)

Larceny, BAH Fraud – General Military Crimes – CHARGES DROPPED (US Army v. E-8 – Fort Drum, New York)

Manslaughter – General Military Crimes – CHARGES DROPPED (U.S. Army v. E-4 – Fort Drum, New York)

Article 121 and 132 – General Military Crimes – CHARGES DROPPED (US Air Force v TSgT – Fairchild, AFB, Washington)

Assault with a Firearm – General Military Crimes – Case Dismissed (U.S. Navy v. E-5)

Larceny, BAH Fraud – General Military Crimes – Case Dismissed (U.S. Army v. SGT – Fort Liberty (Fort Bragg), NC)

Domestic Violence – General Military Crimes – Not Guilty (US Army v. E-7 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Cruelty and Maltreatment – General Military Crimes – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. E-7 – Fort Campbell, Kentucky)

Article 81, 132, and 134 – General Military Crimes – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Air Force v. E-7 – Edwards AFB, California)

Substance Abuse – General Military Crimes – Not Guilty (U.S. Coast Guard v. E-5)

Larceny and Conspiracy – General Military Crimes – Not Guilty (U.S. Army v. E-7 – Fort Moore (Fort Benning), GA)

U.S. Navy v. O-5 – General Military Crimes – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Navy v. O-5 – NRD Portland, Oregon)

Larceny, BAH Fraud – General Military Crimes Not Guilty (US ARMY V. E-8 – Fort Drum, New York)

Larceny – General Military Crimes – FULL ACQUITTAL (U.S. Coast Guard v. E-7 – Mayport Naval Station, Florida)

Drug Distribution – General Military Crimes – FULL ACQUITTAL (US Army vs. E1 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Court Martial – General Military Crimes – CASE DIMISSED! (US Air Force v. TSgt, E-6 – Duke Field, Eglin AFB, Florida)

Court Martial – General Military Crimes – CASE DISMISSED! (Army, SGT, E-5 – Fort Campbell, Kentucky)

Wrongful Use of Government Provided Credit Card and Benefits – Adverse Military Administrative Actions (Army Kansas Reserve E-6)

Letter of Reprimand – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – NO NEGATIVE IMPACT (U.S. Army v. SFC – Fort Leonard Wood, MO)

GOMOR – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – LOCALLY FILED (U.S. Army v. CPT/ O-3 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Article 15 – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – LOSS OF ONE STRIPE (U.S. Army v. SGT – Fort Drum, NY)

Administrative Separation Board – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – HON DISCHARGE (US v. E-7 – Wiesbaden, Germany)

GOMOR – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – LOCALLY FILED (U.S. Army v. 1LT – Arizona Army National Guard)

GOMOR – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – RESUMED COMMAND (U.S. Army v. CPT – Hawaii)

GOMOR – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – CONTINUED CAREER (U.S. Army v. CW3 – Afghanistan/Fort Belvoir)

Article 15 – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – REDUCTION OF PAY (Fort Belvoir, VA)

GOMOR – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – LOCALLY FILED (U.S. Army v. COL – Kuwait)

Article 15 – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – ORAL REPRIMAND (U.S. ARMY V. SSG – Fort Hood, Texas)

Administrative Separation Board – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – HONORABLE DISCHARGE (US v. E-4 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Article 15 – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – REDUCTION (U.S. Army v. SGT – Fort Hood, Texas)

GOMOR – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – WITHDRAWN (US Army v. 03 – Fort Hood, Texas)

15-6 Command Directed Investigation – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – Case Dismissed (United States Army v. O-6 – Fort Jackson, South Carolina)

Referred 15-6 Investigation – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – Case Dismissed (US v. 0-5 – Houston, TX)

Sexual Harassment Claims – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – Case Dismissed (U.S. Navy v. LT – Port Hueneme, California)

Sexual Assault – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – Case Dismissed (US Air Force v. E-6 – Ramstein AFB, Germany)

Article 15 – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – Case Dismissed (U.S. Army v. SSG – Germany)

Referred 15-6 Investigation – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – NOT GUILTY (US V. 0-5 – Houston, TX)

Line of Duty Investigation – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Army v. E-4 – Fort Sam Houston, Texas)

Article 15 – Wrongful Drug Use – Article 112a – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – NOT GUILTY! (U.S. Army v. E-3 – Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), Texas)

Adverse Enlisted Administrative Separation Board – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – NOT GUILTY (US Army V. SGT – Fort Hood, Texas)

GOMOR Rebuttal – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – FILED LOCALLY (US Army v. CPT – Hawaii)

Adverse Administrative Separation Board – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – RETAINED (US Army v. 1LT – Fort Liberty (Fort Bragg), North Carolina – 82nd Airborne Division)

Adverse Enlisted Administrative Separation Board – Adverse Military Administrative Actions – NOT GUILTY, RETAINED (US Army V. SFC – Fort Hood, Texas)

Article 15 Appeal – Adverse Administrative Action – Partial overturn – Rank Retained! (Army, SSG, E-6 stationed in Belgium)

GOMOR – Adverse Administrative Action – Locally Filed! (Army, MSG, E-8, stationed at Caserma Ederle, Italy)

GOMOR – Adverse Administrative Action – Eradicated! Destroyed! (Army, LTC, 0-5, stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado)

Sexual Assault of a Minor – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DROPPED (US Army v. CW2 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Child Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – FULL ACQUITTAL (US Army v. E-5 – Fort Wainwright)

Rape and Aggravated Assault – Military Sexual Assault – DEAL, CHARGES DROPPED (U.S. Navy V. E-6 – NAS Bahrain)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (U.S. Army v. E6 – Fort Bliss, Texas)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NO CONFINEMENT (US Marine Corps vs. E-6 – Okinawa Japan)

Sex Assault – Military Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (U.S. Army v. E-5 – Fort Riley, Kansas)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (U.S. Army v. E-4 – Fort Bliss, Texas)

Sex Assault Charges – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (US Marines v. Warrant Officer – Camp Lejeune, North Carolina)

Forcible Rape – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (US Army v. E-4 – US Army Garrison Wiesbaden, Germany)

Sexual Assault – NINE ALLEGED VICTIMS! – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Airforce v. O4 – Keesler AFB, Mississippi)

Sexual Assault – Article 120 – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. E-4 – US Army Garrison Wiesbaden, Germany)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (Fort Carson, Colorado)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. E-6 – Fort Huachuca, Arizona)

Rape – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (United States Marine Corps v. E-6 – Camp Lejune, North Carolina)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. E-5 – Fort Gordon, Georgia)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (US Air Force v. E-5 – Joint Base Elmendorf- Richardson, Alaska)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (United States Coast Guard v. 01 – US Coast Guard Operations Systems Center, Martinsville, West Virginia)

Rape and Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. 02 – Fort Wainwright, Alaska)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Navy v. E-6 – Naval Air Station Lemoore, California)

Rape – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Navy v. E-3 – Pensacola Naval Station & Corry Station, Pensacola, Florida)

Sexual Abuse of Minor – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Air Force v. E-7 – Ramstein, Air Force Base, Germany)

Rape of Child – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Army v. E-4 – Fort Hood Texas)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Army v. E-5 – Fort Hood Texas)

Rape- Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Army V. Captain – Fort Leonard Wood Missouri)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Army v. E-6 – Fort Hood, Texas)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Army V. E-7 – Kaiserslautern, Germany)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US v. E8 – Ramstein AFB, Germany)

Rape – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Army V. E-5 – Fort Bliss, Texas)

NCIS Investigation – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Navy v. E6)

Wrongful Sexual Contact – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US ARMY V. CAPTAIN – Fort Hood Texas)

Forcible Rape – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (US Air Force V. E-4)

Sex Assault – Military Sexual Assault – FULL AQUITTAL! (U.S. Air Force v. E-3 – Beale AFB, California)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – NOT GUILTY (U.S. Army v. E-3 – Vicenza, Italy)

Rape – Military Sexual Assault – ACQUITTED (US Army v. 1LT – Fort Liberty (Fort Bragg), North Carolina – 82nd Airborne Division)

Sexual Assault and Assault – Military Sexual Assault – ACQUITTAL (US Air Force v. E-6 – Peterson AFB, Colorado)

Rape – Military Sexual Assault – ACQUITTAL (U.S. Navy V. E-4 – NAS Bahrain)

Sexual Assault – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED (US Navy V. E-3 JOINT BASE – San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston Texas)

Forcible Rape – Military Sexual Assault – FULL ACQUITTAL (U.S. Army V. E-4 – Fort Riley, Kansas)

Sexual Assault – Article 120 – Military Sexual Assault – FULL ACQUITTAL (US Army v. 1LT – Fort Liberty (Fort Bragg), North Carolina – 82nd Airborne Division)

Court Martial – Military Sexual Assault – CASE DISMISSED! (US Air Force v. TSgt, E-6 – Cannon AFB, New Mexico)

E-3 –Fort Leonard Wood – 120 investigation

E-4 –Naval Air Station, Sigonella Italy – 120 investigation – Dismissed

E-6 –Fort Leonard Wood – 120b, Child Sex Assault

E-6- Fort Leonard Wood – 120, Sex Assault

E-4 – Fort Sam Houston, Texas – Initiation of Administrative Separation

E-6 Marines – MCAS Miramar, California – Administrative Separation Board: No Basis to Separate. Retained

E-7 – Army – Presidio of Monterey – Administrative Separation Board: No basis to Separate. Retained

CW2 – Flight Evaluation Board – Exonerated and cleared to fly.

1LT – Fort Hood – DASEB Case

E-5- Army Reservist in Oregon – GOMOR Eradicated

ARTICLE 121 – GENERAL MILITARY CRIMES – CASE DISMISSED (E-6 – Hurlburt AFB)

ARTICLE 128 – GENERAL MILITARY CRIMES – CASE DISMISSED (E-3 – Little Rock AFB)

ARTICLE 114 – GENERAL MILITARY CRIMES – CASE DISMISSED (E-6 – Cannon AFB)

Article 112a – General Military Crimes – Case Dismissed (E-6 – Barksdale, AFB)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (CW2 – Fort Riley )

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (MAJ – Kuwait )

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (CW2 – Fort Hood)

BOI – Board of Inquiry – RETAINED (O-3 – Fort Hood)