UNDER INVESTIGATION UNDER AR 15-6? HERE’S WHAT YOU’RE ACTUALLY FACING

And why your response—now—matters more than you think.

A 15-6 investigation can seem informal at first glance. You may not have been charged, and no courtroom date has been set. But make no mistake—what’s said, what’s recorded, and what’s assumed in this phase can shape the rest of your career. That’s why it matters to understand exactly how the process works—and where you stand inside it.

WHAT TRIGGERS AN AR 15-6 INVESTIGATION?

An AR 15-6 investigation starts when a commander wants an official review of a possible policy violation or misconduct. It’s not always criminal, but it can become that. Common triggers include:

• Accusations of harassment, fraternization, or toxic leadership
• Suspected misuse or loss of government property
• EO complaints or allegations of reprisal
• Hazing, inappropriate punishment, or other command climate issues

These investigations follow a regulation, not a script. Some are quick. Some expand. Some go nowhere. Others spiral into separation actions or court-martial referrals. How you respond—and when—makes all the difference.

WHAT HAPPENS DURING AN AR 15-6 INVESTIGATION?

Once appointed, the Investigating Officer (IO) begins collecting facts. That includes witness statements, physical evidence (emails, text logs, reports), and sometimes your own words. In informal cases, you may be approached casually—asked to “give your side” or “help clarify the situation.” That’s when risk begins.

In both formal and informal AR 15-6 investigations, here’s what typically happens:

• The IO reaches out to those involved
• Testimony may be collected (written, sworn, or informal)
• Documentary evidence is reviewed
• A findings-and-recommendation report is submitted

You might not be interviewed at all. Or you might be asked for a written statement. Either way, the IO’s final report can follow you—for years.

HOW TO RESPOND TO AN AR 15-6 INVESTIGATION (AND WHY TIMING MATTERS)

Silence isn’t avoidance. It’s protection.

When you learn you’re being investigated—whether you’re labeled a “subject” or not—take a pause. This is the moment to engage counsel, not command. If you’re wondering how to respond to an AR 15-6 investigation, here’s where to start:

• Don’t submit a statement until a lawyer reviews the request
• Ask whether you’re a subject or a witness
• Gather records that may be relevant
• Don’t speak informally to peers or superiors about the matter
• Contact a lawyer with actual AR 15-6 experience

A well-timed, properly framed response can shape how the IO—and your chain of command—view your involvement. That’s not legal spin. It’s strategy.

DO I NEED A LAWYER FOR AN AR 15-6 INVESTIGATION?

Yes. Even if the investigation is informal. Even if they tell you it’s “just an inquiry.” Especially then.

An experienced military attorney for AR 15-6 investigation ensures your rights are preserved and your voice is used with purpose. At this stage, your legal counsel can:

• Advise on whether and how to respond
• Submit documentation on your behalf
• Challenge bias or overreach by the IO
• Identify gaps in the investigation
• Create a written defense narrative—before the command draws conclusions

Don’t assume JAG or TDS will do this. Many AR 15-6 subjects don’t get official legal representation at all unless charges follow. By then, the record is set.

AR 15-6 INVESTIGATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION

Not every investigation ends in punishment. But plenty lead to administrative separation. A substantiated finding—based on the IO’s report alone—can be enough to initiate a chapter board.

That means:

• You could be discharged without ever being charged
• Your discharge characterization may affect benefits
• Your DD-214 could carry lasting stigma
• You may lose access to re-enlistment, VA education benefits, or retirement eligibility

Even if your chain of command frames the investigation as “just internal,” its consequences can follow you into civilian life. That’s why early legal guidance is essential.

WHAT IF THE INVESTIGATION IS UNFAIR? CAN YOU FIGHT BACK?

Yes—and the hearing officer’s recommendation is not final.

Your attorney can:

• Submit a rebuttal to the findings
• Challenge the process as biased or incomplete
• Request that additional evidence be included in the case file
• Prepare you for follow-on proceedings, such as a separation board

This isn’t just about protecting you now. It’s about preserving your future options. Once something enters the official record, it can affect security clearances, advancement, and command trust—regardless of whether you were ever punished.

WHY CHOOSE JOSEPH L. JORDAN AS YOUR AR 15-6 ATTORNEY?

Joseph Jordan doesn’t just “know” military investigations—he ran them. As a former Army JAG and combat arms officer, he’s handled cases from both sides. His legal team provides global representation for service members facing command-directed inquiries, including AR 15-6 investigations across Europe, Asia, and every CONUS installation.

When you retain our firm, we:

• Evaluate the investigation's structure, scope, and legality
• Draft clear, factual responses that support your position
• Build defense strategies that anticipate separation or court-martial escalation
• Fight for dismissal of unsupported findings—on the record

This is not about playing defense after damage is done. It’s about entering the process with a plan.

📞 CONSULT AN AR 15-6 ATTORNEY WHO KNOWS MILITARY LAW INSIDE OUT
Before the IO starts forming conclusions—make sure your defense is already in motion. Call (866) 624-7503 to schedule a confidential consultation with AR 15-6 attorney Joseph L. Jordan. The process moves fast. Your response should move faster.