MILITARY LAW BLOG

FOOTBALLER BRI’ONTE DUNN ACQUITTED OF RAPE CHARGES, ACCUSER FALSIFIED CLAIMS

U.S. V. BARRY CONVICTION REVERSAL RAISES QUESTIONS ABOUT UNDUE INFLUENCE

UCMJ UPDATE MAKES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE A SEPARATE CRIMINAL VIOLATION UNDER MILITARY LAW

AIR FORCE ACADEMY ENCOURAGES REPORTED SEXUAL ASSAULT BY REMOVING VICTIM “PUNISHMENTS”

CAAF DECISION GIVES CCA POWER TO DISAPPROVE MANDATORY MINIMUM PUNITIVE DISCHARGE

CAAF APPROVES REVIEW OF ARTICLE 2(A)(3) & RESERVE JURISDICTION PROBLEM

U.S. V. SCHLOFF AUTHORIZED REVERSED CONVICTION AFTER UNLAWFUL COMMAND INFLUENCE JEOPARDIZES FINDINGS

PREEMPTION DOCTRINE IS NEWLY LIMITED BY CAAF IN U.S. V WHEELER

INVESTIGATORS ACCESS SUSPECT ACCOUNT AFTER EAVESDROPPING, CCA UPHOLDS ACTION

ARMY CCA REVERSES CONVICTION BROUGHT BY UNJUST CELLPHONE SEARCH & SEIZURE

WHIDBEY CREW IN TROUBLE AFTER AIRCRAFT PRANK

ARMY MOVES TO COURT-MARTIAL A RETIRED GENERAL OFFICER

GROSS GOVERNMENTAL MISCONDUCT ULTIMATELY HARMLESS IN U.S. V. CLAXTON

AIR FORCE CCA DECISION MAY FORBID USE OF OLD PRESCRIPTION MEDICATION

4TH AMENDMENT VIOLATION CAUSES REVERSAL OF US V. DARNELL

NMCCA HOLDS CONSTITUTION CAN’T REQUIRE PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED RECORDS BUT, THERE ARE OTHER REMEDIES!

ARMY CCA CONFUSES ISSUE OF PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY FURTHER

DISHONESTY LED TO MISTRIAL IN UNITED STATES V. COMMISSO

CAAF REVERSES US V. BRANTLEY, CALLING FOR REVIEW IN LIGHT OF US V. SAGER

U.S. V. REESE CHARGES REVERSED BY CAAF AFTER MAJOR CHANGE GOES UNADDRESSED

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS IN U.S. V. HALE CAUSE CONVICTION REVERSAL

UNLAWFUL COMMAND INFLUENCE MEANS A NEW TRIAL IN U.S. V. BOYCE

REVERSAL OF U.S. V. HENDRIX CONVICTION

NEW ACCA DECISION – MRE 513 (LK V. ACOSTA & RPI SFC SANCHEZ)

A THIRD FACA COMMITTEE CREATED OVERSEE MILITARY JUSTICE REGARDING SEX CRIMES

MRE 414 IN CHILD MOLESTATION CASES & HOW IT IMPACTED U.S. V. FETROW

RETIRED SERVICE MEMBERS ARE STILL SERVICE MEMBERS, SAYS NMCCA

PROHIBITED ONLINE MISCONDUCT AMONG ARMY MEMBERS CAN BE PENALIZED

NEW TRIAL GRANTED TO AIR FORCE MEMBER AFTER FAVORABLE EVIDENCE APPEARS

ACQUITTAL DOESN’T RULE OUT ALL FACTS, AFFIRMS U.S. V. ROSARIO