TRUSTED REPRESENTATION

Court-Martial Defense by Military Attorney
Joseph L. Jordan

Representing Military Members Across the Globe Facing Military Investigations and Courts-Martial

Overview of Our Military Justice

Clients Served
0 +
Trials to a verdict
0 +
Years of Experience
0 +

Experienced Winner of Multiple Multi-Victim Trials

Military Attorney Joseph L. Jordan Represents

Civilian courts do not work like this. In the military, it starts with a commander, not a judge. Maybe it is an Article 15. Maybe you are facing a court-martial before you know what hit you. Either way, one bad decision, one charge, can take your rank, pay, clearance, and toss your career. And no, this is not a time for general advice. It is defense or disaster. That is why we do not offer “guidance.” We offer protection. Real, trial-tested defense for service members who have spent years building careers, only to watch it all hang by a thread. Whether it is your first briefing or you have already been read your rights, this is the moment where everything turns. One move in your favor or one silence too long can decide whether you stay in uniform or go home empty.

Our Legal Services

Military justice proceedings require specialized knowledge of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and military court procedures. Our legal team has extensive experience representing service members in court-martial trials, administrative separation proceedings, and non-judicial punishment hearings. Attorney Joseph L. Jordan’s background as a former JAG officer and military prosecutor provides valuable insight into military legal proceedings.

Adverse Military Administrative Actions

Adverse military administrative actions can end a career built over years of service. Our firm steps in early to challenge flawed investigations, correct records, and defend your right to continue serving with honor.

Board of Inquiry

Board of Inquiry proceedings determine whether an officer should be retained or separated from military service. These administrative hearings can result in involuntary separation or other career-ending actions. We represent officers at Board of Inquiry hearings, present evidence, cross-examine witnesses, and advocate for retention.

General Military Crimes

The UCMJ encompasses a wide range of offenses specific to military service. From unauthorized absence to violations of lawful orders, military crimes carry penalties including confinement, rank reduction, and discharge. We provide defense representation for service members facing charges under any article of the UCMJ.

Military Sexual Assault

Article 120 allegations involve serious charges with severe potential consequences. These cases require thorough investigation and experienced legal representation. We represent service members accused of sexual assault offen

Why Hire Us?

  • Defending Military Crimes

    You do not get warnings in military cases, you get read your rights. And by the time command starts asking questions, they are not asking out of curiosity. Whether it is a military crime involving drugs, sexual misconduct, assault, or worse, the weight of that charge can crush your career fast. Jordan defends service members who find themselves under investigation, sometimes before they even know what the accusation really is. That is when defense begins, not after it is too late.

  • Aggressive Defense Against Article 120 Sexual Assault Charges

    Article 120 charges can undo a career faster than any other offense in the military justice system. Once the accusation surfaces, whether it is a barracks rumor or a formal report, command response is often immediate and unforgiving. Jordan has defended service members accused of a wide range of Article 120 allegations, including sexual assault of a minor. These cases are volatile. He does not just challenge the evidence, he makes the government prove every detail, because in cases like this, assumptions come first and facts arrive late.

  • Helping You Fight Manslaughter and Murder Charges

    Murder and manslaughter charges under Article 118 and Article 119 of the UCMJ carry not only the harshest penalties in military law, but also the most complex legal dynamics. These are not cases for a generalist or an inexperienced counsel. Joseph L. Jordan, Attorney at Law, brings years of UCMJ-specific trial experience to the table. As a former JAG prosecutor turned defense attorney, he knows how to scrutinize the government’s case and build a strong, fact-driven strategy on your behalf before trial even begins.

  • Defending Military Members Against Article 112a Drug Crimes

    Article 112a drug crimes do not always come in the form of obvious violations. Sometimes it is a positive urinalysis after taking something off-base. Sometimes it is pills a friend handed over, no prescription, no questions. But the outcome is the same as the worst-case scenario: confinement, loss of rank, even an other-than-honorable discharge. These charges hit fast and leave a mark. Joseph Jordan does not just fight the evidence, he questions how it was gathered, who handled it, and whether your command moved too fast. Drug crimes under 112a are not about what is fair. They are about what is proven, and he makes sure proof is the only thing that counts.

We Are Committed to Serving You

Joseph L. Jordan is a former Army JAG officer and a full-time military attorney focused exclusively on defending service members accused of crimes under the UCMJ. With a background that includes service as an enlisted Soldier, a combat arms officer, and a JAG prosecutor, he brings rare perspective to the courtroom, knowing exactly how military systems work from the inside. Today, he travels globally to represent clients across every branch of the Armed Forces, providing independent and strategic legal advocacy that is grounded in real military experience, not command influence. His legal work is entirely dedicated to representing service members in military-specific proceedings. From charges involving unauthorized absence under Article 86 to sexual misconduct under Article 120, he defends clients facing general and special court-martial trials, Article 15 actions, adverse discharge recommendations, and administrative separation boards. Jordan’s background allows him to approach each case with both legal strategy and operational insight, especially in environments shaped by rank structure and command authority. Having served at posts including Fort Hood, Germany, Japan, Italy and Korea, he understands how fast allegations escalate and how vital early defense truly is. His priority is not just legal protection, but career preservation.

Start Your Case Review

Contact Us Today

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Why Military Defense Demands More Than Free Representation

The military justice system follows a distinct structure. Legal actions are often initiated within the command environment rather than through civilian prosecutors, and legal decisions are typically handled by officers operating inside the same chain of authority. Attorneys provided through the military system fulfill critical responsibilities and serve honorably, but they work within defined roles that support multiple institutional needs.

These roles can involve a combination of assignments, including legal assistance, administrative law, and rotation through prosecution or defense duties. As a result, the focus may be broad rather than singular. By contrast, a civilian military defense attorney is committed exclusively to your case, with no competing obligations or structural constraints. That independence allows for early intervention, targeted strategy, and an unwavering commitment to protecting your rights and future.

The military justice system follows a distinct structure. Legal actions are often initiated within the command environment rather than through civilian prosecutors, and legal decisions are typically handled by officers operating inside the same chain of authority. Attorneys provided through the military system fulfill critical responsibilities and serve honorably, but they work within defined roles that support multiple institutional needs.

These roles can involve a combination of assignments, including legal assistance, administrative law, and rotation through prosecution or defense duties. As a result, the focus may be broad rather than singular. By contrast, a civilian military defense attorney is committed exclusively to your case, with no competing obligations or structural constraints. That independence allows for early intervention, targeted strategy, and an unwavering commitment to protecting your rights and future.

Our Professional Team

When you work with us, you can trust your case is in the hands of the following members:

ATTORNEY JOSEPH L. JORDAN

Former Prosecutor

Joseph L. Jordan is a former Army JAG officer who served as both prosecutor and defense counsel. He served at installations including Fort Hood, and overseas locations in Germany, Japan, Italy, and Korea. He now provides full-time representation to service members facing UCMJ proceedings.

TASHA CARNAHAN

Senior Paralegal

Tasha Carnahan served in the U.S. Army as a paralegal for seven years. She assisted military attorneys advising commanders and now provides paralegal support for military defense cases.

PATTI VANCIL

Office Manager

Patti Vancil brings operational management experience to the firm. As the parent of service members with ten years of military service, she understands military family concerns and coordinates client communications.

JUSTIN SCHEIDER

General Practitioner Attorney 

Justin Scheider is a General Practitioner Attorney based in Little Rock, Arkansas, serving as Of Counsel to the firm.

ATTORNEY NICHOLAS C. DAUSCHMIDT

former military defense counsel

Nicholas “Nick” DauSchmidt, Attorney at Law, is based out of Vicenza, Italy. He serves as Of Counsel to the Joseph Jordan UCMJ Law Group and is a former judge advocate (JAG) with over twelve years of experience as a military attorney in uniform. 

OUR AWARDS & ACCOLADES

Honored by leading legal organizations for our dedication, integrity, and proven results.
2013 Client's Choice Military

Military Lawyer Jordan's Most Recent Victories

U.S. Army v. 0-4

Counter Productive Leadership– Military Adverse Administrative Action- Board of Inquiry (Show Cause Board) U.S. Army v. 0-4 – Fort Hood – No Basis to Separate – RETAINED!

Our client is a West Point Graduate. He is very accomplished in his career and knows how to execute a mission and get things done.

U.S. Army v. WO1

Domestic Violence– Military Adverse Administrative Action- Board of Inquiry (Show Cause Board U.S. Army v. WO1 – Fort Sill – No Basis to Separate – RETAINED!

This Soldier was falsely accused of domestic violence by his ex-wife, and two oldest children.

U.S. Army v. E-3

Sexual Assault – Military Adverse Administrative Action- Administrative Separation Board (U.S. Army v. E-3 – Fort Hood – No Basis to Separate – RETAINED!)

This case turned out to be yet another alcohol infused barracks sex case. The alleged victim invited my client to a party.

Contact Joseph L. Jordan, Your Military Criminal Defense Lawyer

Hiring a UCMJ lawyer who has served at multiple levels of the military justice system provides a strategic edge that goes beyond legal knowledge. Joseph L. Jordan uses his background inside command structures to identify weaknesses in government cases, challenge premature Article 32 recommendations, and influence early decisions that often shape the outcome long before trial. His defense strategy begins the moment an accusation is raised, not after the paperwork is filed. That includes filing precision-based motions, securing time-sensitive discovery, and applying procedural pressure to delay or redirect command actions.

As Featured on

A DEFENSE TEAM READY TO FIGHT FOR YOU

When facing military legal proceedings, prompt consultation is important. Contact Joseph L. Jordan, Attorney at Law, to discuss your case. We offer legal guidance to military service members worldwide, with appointments available by phone or video consultation. Complete the form or call (888)554-1396 to schedule a consultation.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.