MILITARY LAW BLOG

LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE REVERSES GUILTY PLEA IN U.S. V. NIETO

MILITARY JUDGE CALLS TRUMP’S COMMENTS ON BERGDAHL “DISTURBING”

U.S. V. MUWWAKKIL: MISSING EVIDENCE LEADS TO CASE CONTROVERSY

U.S. V. BOWEN REHEARING AUTHORIZED DUE TO USE OF “EXCITED UTTERANCE” PROOF

WHEN HOUSEBREAKING DOESN’T REQUIRE WALLS OR CEILINGS

CHELSEA MANNING TO BE RELEASED 28 YEARS EARLY

CAAF TO CONSIDER HOW 4TH AMENDMENT APPLIES TO COMPUTER SEARCHES

BERGDAHL PROSECUTORS BARRED FROM USING WOUNDS

BERGDAHL “RESPONSIBLE FOR CERTAIN AMOUNT” OF DANGEROUS MISSIONS

ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RE-EXAMINES HILLS DECISION

FEDERAL COURT VACATES MARINE DISCHARGE IN CONTROVERSIAL CASE

UNDERSTANDING “SEXTORTION” IN THE MILITARY

JSC CLARIFIES ARTICLE 134 DEFINITIONS, DISJUNCTIVES

HOW DOES TRUMP’S ELECTION AFFECT THE BERGDAHL CASE?

SENATOR MCCAIN’S COMMENTS DID NOT INFLUENCE BERGDAHL CASE

ARMY APPEALS COURT MAKES CONTROVERSIAL EVIDENCE RULING

MILITARY COURT: MANDATORY MINIMUMS APPLY TO ATTEMPTED SEX OFFENSES

SECOND PSYCHIATRIST REQUESTED IN BERGDAHL CASE

CAAF RULES ON MARINE’S BIBLE VERSE CASE

NEW PROPENSITY DECISION ALREADY PRODUCING NEW CASE REVIEWS

CCA EXTENDS PSYCHOTHERAPIST-PATIENT PRIVILEGE

NMCCA ENFORCES OLD CORROBORATION RULE IN SEXUAL ASSAULT CASE

CAAF REJECTS FOURTH AMENDMENT ISSUE IN CANINE CASE

HIGH MILITARY COURT SPLIT ON HUMAN LIE DETECTOR ISSUE

CAAF STRIKES DOWN “PROPENSITY” EVIDENCE RULE CONCERNING PRIOR CHARGES

APPEALS RULING LIMITS COURT JURISDICTION OVER ALLEGED VICTIM’S PETITION

APPEALS COURT ENFORCES REHEARING FOLLOWING “PLAIN ERROR”

SCOTUS RULING MAKES EVIDENCE IN SOME ILLEGAL STOPS ADMISSIBLE

THE NAVY CLARIFIES MEDICAL REPORTING LAW

AIR FORCE TIMES PUBLISHES OP-ED SUPPORTING MILITARY JUSTICE REFORM