AIR FORCE ACADEMY ENCOURAGES REPORTED SEXUAL ASSAULT BY REMOVING VICTIM “PUNISHMENTS”

The Air Force Academy has made a significant rule change in order to encourage service members to report incidents of sexual assault from other airmen and airwomen. In specific, “collateral” misconduct violations and their related penalties will not be filed against someone who comes forward with a sexual assault allegation. Underage drinking, fraternization, and recreational drug use are all … Read more

Categories All

CAAF DECISION GIVES CCA POWER TO DISAPPROVE MANDATORY MINIMUM PUNITIVE DISCHARGE

The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) has presented its decision for United States v Kelly. The CAAF’s opinion has held that a Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) has the legal ability to disapprove a mandatory minimum punitive discharge when the penalty would be “inappropriately severe.” The decision has creates the potential … Read more

CAAF APPROVES REVIEW OF ARTICLE 2(A)(3) & RESERVE JURISDICTION PROBLEM

A reservist of the United States Armed Forces must still comply with the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), as long as they are performing a duty that directly coincides with their reservist status. Within Article 2(a)(3), a court-martial jurisdiction’s power is further limited to reservists on inactive-duty training, or to Army National Guard and … Read more

Categories All

U.S. V. SCHLOFF AUTHORIZED REVERSED CONVICTION AFTER UNLAWFUL COMMAND INFLUENCE JEOPARDIZES FINDINGS

In United States v. Schloff, 74 M.J. 312 (CAAF 2015), the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) maintained the definitions of sexual contact in military criminal justice settings. In particular, it held sexual contact described in Article 120 (g)(2) can be defined by body-to-body contact and/or object-to-body contact. Perhaps more importantly, though, it and the Army … Read more

PREEMPTION DOCTRINE IS NEWLY LIMITED BY CAAF IN U.S. V WHEELER

The Preemption Doctrine of military law and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) acts as a limitation to Article 134, UCMJ. The first clause of the Preemption Doctrine states that Article 134 does not have the authority to prohibit actions that are “already prohibited by Congress in UCMJ articles 78 and 80-132.” United States v. … Read more

Categories All

INVESTIGATORS ACCESS SUSPECT ACCOUNT AFTER EAVESDROPPING, CCA UPHOLDS ACTION

In United States v. Langhorne, military investigators admitted to monitoring the defendant’s phone calls to learn his Facebook account name and password. After obtaining the private information, the investigators logged into account to get transcripts of conversations, including some that reportedly outlined a plot to hire a professional hitman. The groundwork of the investigation and the … Read more

Categories All

ARMY CCA REVERSES CONVICTION BROUGHT BY UNJUST CELLPHONE SEARCH & SEIZURE

The United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) has contradicted a lower court’s decision to deny an evidence suppression motion put forth by the defense. In a sexual misconduct case that accused Private First Class Morales of multiple Article 120 and Article 120c violations, the defense argued a search of the defendant’s cellphone was unjustified because the investigators … Read more

Categories All

WHIDBEY CREW IN TROUBLE AFTER AIRCRAFT PRANK

On November 16, 2017, residents in Okanogan, Washington, looked up to see a giant phallus sketched in the blue autumn sky. It was left there by the Navy crew of the EA-18G Growler, based at Whidbey Island Naval Air Station, and Navy superiors are not impressed. According to a statement released by the Navy the … Read more

Categories All

ARMY MOVES TO COURT-MARTIAL A RETIRED GENERAL OFFICER

Over the weekend, an Article 32 preliminary hearing was held to consider allegations of rape of a child by retired Army Major General James J. Grazioplene. The retired general is accused of committing rape on six different occasions between 1983 and 1989 while he was stationed in the United States and Germany. This move isn’t … Read more

Categories All

GROSS GOVERNMENTAL MISCONDUCT ULTIMATELY HARMLESS IN U.S. V. CLAXTON

In the case of U.S. v. Claxton, Air Force Cadet Stephan H. Claxton was convicted of wrongful sexual contact of one alleged victim, attempted abusive sexual contact and assault consummated by a battery of a second alleged victim, and two specifications of assault consummated by a battery for a physical altercation with two other cadets. The … Read more

Categories All