Military Sexual Assault Attorney
If you've been accused of military sexual assault, immediate legal protection is essential. Your career, freedom, and family stability depend on the defense you build right now, not weeks from now when charges are formally preferred.
Joseph L. Jordan, former Army JAG officer and expert military sexual assault defense lawyer, provides relentless legal protection for service members worldwide facing sexual assault allegations. With over a decade of exclusive military defense experience and proven courtroom victories across every service branch, we deliver the independent, aggressive representation these cases demand.
Protect Your Future Now: Every Moment Counts
Don't talk to investigators without your lawyer. Exercise your Article 31 rights immediately. Nothing you say will help your case. Statements cannot be withdrawn and will be used against you at trial. This is not the time to explain yourself or "clear things up."
Call (888) 643-6254 now. Initial consultation is confidential. We respond 24/7 to service members worldwide. Every hour you wait puts your defense at risk.
Preserve all evidence immediately. Text messages, social media, emails, photos, and any communications related to the allegations. Digital evidence disappears through automatic deletions and device changes. What you save today could prove your innocence tomorrow.
Write down every detail now, while your memory is fresh. Document your timeline. Identify potential witnesses before command restricts contact. This could make all the difference in your defense.
Why Experienced Military Sexual Assault Defense Matters
Military sexual assault prosecution operates unlike civilian criminal defense in every meaningful way. Commanders hold charging authority under political pressure to prosecute. Special Victim Prosecutors dedicate full-time resources to securing convictions. Institutional oversight creates systematic bias toward court-martial regardless of evidence quality.
Your appointed military defense counsel operates within this system: They serve in the same chain of command as prosecutors. They carry multiple simultaneous cases. They face career pressures that limit aggressive defense tactics. They cannot dedicate unlimited time to a single case.
Successful defense requires an attorney who understands this ecosystem from inside, then fights it from outside. Someone who served as a JAG officer, knows command culture intimately, understands prosecutorial strategies, and faces zero institutional pressure to compromise your defense.
Former JAG experience provides critical advantages:
Joseph L. Jordan prosecuted and defended courts-martial as an Army Judge Advocate before establishing his civilian defense practice. This dual perspective means:
- Familiarity with prosecution strategies and case-building methods
- Understanding of command decision-making and convening authority psychology
- Credibility to confront government counsel without institutional restraint
- Insight into military judge preferences and panel member deliberation patterns
- Knowledge of procedural vulnerabilities that inexperienced counsel miss
Civilian defense counsel operate completely outside the chain of command. We face no career consequences for aggressive motion practice, challenging command decisions, or exposing procedural violations. Our sole obligation is to you, not the institution, not career advancement, not political optics.
The First 72 Hours: Why Immediate Action is Critical for Your Defense
Once a sexual assault allegation surfaces, multiple systems activate simultaneously: criminal investigation, command notification, witness interviews, evidence collection. Every word you speak could be the difference between keeping your career and losing your future.
The first 72 hours are your window of opportunity to shape your defense. How you act now could make or break your future.
What happens immediately after allegations:
Investigators Contact You: CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS agents attempt to interview you. They read Article 31 rights but suggest cooperation demonstrates innocence. They claim innocent people have nothing to hide. They warn that failure to explain yourself looks suspicious. These are interrogation techniques designed to elicit incriminating statements.
Digital Evidence Begins Disappearing: Text messages auto-delete. Social media posts can be removed. Cloud storage gets overwritten. Device upgrades permanently erase data. Every hour without proper preservation increases the risk of losing exculpatory evidence forever.
Witnesses Form Opinions: Fellow service members hear rumors and form beliefs about what happened. Command may restrict your contact with potential defense witnesses. Their memories become contaminated by speculation and time.
Command Makes Preliminary Decisions: Your commander receives investigator and legal staff briefings. Initial impressions form about guilt and appropriate action. Preliminary decisions about restriction, clearance suspension, and duty assignment get made.
How we protect you in the first 72 hours:
We Take Immediate Action to Safeguard Your Rights and Evidence: Our first move is to ensure your rights are protected immediately. We assert your Article 31 rights and prevent statements to investigators without our presence. We control all communication with command, investigators, and legal authorities. They don't get to you without going through us first.
Emergency Evidence Preservation: We freeze digital evidence before automatic deletions occur. We secure devices, accounts, and communications. We document chain of custody. We retain forensic experts when necessary. What you might think is gone, we can often recover and preserve.
Witness Identification and Documentation: We identify potential defense witnesses before command restrictions prevent contact. We conduct preliminary interviews to lock in their recollections while memory remains fresh. Your version of events gets documented and preserved, not just theirs.
Command Influence Monitoring: We monitor all command communications, briefings, and decisions for unlawful command influence indicators. We document procedural irregularities. We preserve the record for future motion practice. When they overstep, we catch it.
Expert Retention: We retain independent forensic analysts, toxicologists, and medical professionals before government experts shape the narrative. Early expert involvement allows us to challenge prosecution theories from investigation stage rather than playing defense at trial. We build our case while they're still building theirs.
Nothing said to "clear things up" ever helps. Investigators build prosecution cases, they do not determine innocence. They are trained to make you feel like talking will help you. It won't. Every service member who gave a statement "just to explain" regretted it later. Don't be one of them.
Early counsel intervention is the single most important factor in successful defense outcomes. The difference between service members who walk free and those who lose everything often comes down to whether they had an attorney in those first critical hours.
Understanding Institutional Pressure to Prosecute
Modern military sexual assault prosecution operates under Congressional oversight metrics, career stakes, and public relations imperatives that create systematic pressure toward court-martial. Your defense must anticipate, not merely complain about, this reality and neutralize it through aggressive motion practice.
Congressional Oversight Creates Prosecution Pressure:
Service branches report sexual assault prosecution statistics to Congress quarterly. Low prosecution rates generate negative political attention. High prosecution rates generate institutional praise. Commanders who decline to prosecute face Inspector General investigations, media inquiries, and Congressional questions.
The institutional message creates an environment where prosecution is strongly favored, even in marginal cases. Your defense must expose this pressure through unlawful command influence motions and force command to document decision-making on the record.
Special Victim Prosecutors Operate With Enhanced Resources:
Every service branch employs JAG officers who handle sexual assault cases exclusively. These prosecutors receive specialized training and operate in an environment where case outcomes are closely tracked. They face no competing priorities beyond securing convictions in sexual assault cases.
Alleged Victim Preferences Strongly Influence Outcomes:
Current regulations require commanders to consult alleged victims before case disposition. While commanders retain final discretion, alleged victim preferences strongly influence outcomes. Commanders who dismiss charges over victim objections face institutional scrutiny and career consequences.
How we combat institutional pressure:
We expose unlawful command influence (UCI), when commanders improperly pressure the process toward prosecution, through aggressive discovery and motion practice. We force commanders to document decision-making processes. We challenge briefings, emails, and command climate statements that create pressure to prosecute. We redirect focus from institutional optics to law and evidence.
How We Build Your Defense: Strategy and Experience
Military sexual assault defense isn't about theory. It's about understanding how investigations unfold, where procedural violations occur, and when to engage aggressively. Our strategy comes from hundreds of courts-martial across every service branch.
Early Intervention and Control: We take immediate action from the first moment of contact. We assert your rights before you make damaging statements. We preserve evidence before it disappears. We identify witnesses before command restricts access.
Investigation Oversight: We review investigation methods for procedural violations, evidence mishandling, and constitutional violations. We challenge search authorizations and expose improper interrogation techniques. We force transparency through aggressive discovery motions.
Aggressive Defense Strategy: We challenge illegally obtained confessions. We attack unreliable expert testimony. We expose unlawful command influence. We force the government to prove every element of their case at every stage of proceedings.
Trial Execution: Focused cross-examination exposes credibility problems and false testimony. Expert witnesses challenge prosecution theories with scientific evidence. We present your defense through credible witnesses and documentary evidence that creates reasonable doubt.
Strategic Resolution When Appropriate: In cases where evidence creates conviction risk, we negotiate agreements that avoid the most severe penalties while preserving appeal rights and potentially retaining benefits. We never recommend pleas without complete case analysis and candid risk assessment.
Proven Results and Worldwide Representation
Joseph L. Jordan has successfully defended service members in military sexual assault cases across every service branch and at installations worldwide. Our results demonstrate courtroom skill and strategic case resolution:
Recent Court-Martial Victories:
- U.S. Air Force v. O-4, Keesler AFB, Mississippi: NINE alleged victims, NOT GUILTY on all charges
- U.S. Army v. CPT, Fort Hood, Texas: Sexual assault charges, NOT GUILTY
- U.S. Marine Corps v. E-6, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina: Rape charges, NOT GUILTY
- U.S. Army v. E-8, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri: Child sexual assault, NOT GUILTY
- U.S. Air Force v. E-6, Whiteman AFB, Missouri: Sexual assault, NOT GUILTY
- U.S. Army v. E-5, Fort Bliss, Texas: Rape charges, NOT GUILTY
- U.S. Coast Guard v. O-1, Martinsville, West Virginia: Sexual assault, NOT GUILTY
Administrative Separation Board Victories:
- U.S. Army v. E-3, Fort Hood: Sexual assault allegations, NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED
- U.S. Air Force v. LTC, Wright Patterson AFB: Board of Inquiry, NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED
- U.S. Army v. SSG, Eglin AFB: Administrative board, NO BASIS TO SEPARATE, RETAINED
Case Dismissals During Investigation:
- U.S. Army v. E-6, Fort Bliss: Sexual assault investigation, CASE DISMISSED
- U.S. Marines v. Warrant Officer, Camp Lejeune: CASE DISMISSED
- U.S. Army v. E-4, Wiesbaden, Germany: Forcible rape, CASE DISMISSED
- U.S. Air Force v. E-3, Langley AFB: Sexual assault, CASE DISMISSED
Worldwide Representation:
We represent service members at installations throughout the United States and overseas. No distance limits your right to experienced civilian defense counsel.
CONUS: Fort Hood, Fort Liberty, Fort Campbell, Fort Bliss, Fort Riley, Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Drum, Fort Carson, Fort Benning, Joint Base San Antonio, Whiteman AFB, Langley AFB, Barksdale AFB, Keesler AFB, Camp Lejeune, Camp Pendleton, NAS Pensacola, NAS Lemoore, and dozens more.
OCONUS: Germany (Ramstein, Wiesbaden, Baumholder, Kaiserslautern), Italy (Vicenza, Sigonella), Japan (Okinawa), Korea, Kuwait, Bahrain, and forward-deployed locations worldwide.
Ships and Expeditionary Units: We represent service members on ships at sea, forward operating bases, and expeditionary units wherever stationed or deployed.
Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Every case is different and must be evaluated on its own facts and circumstances.
What's at Stake: Beyond the Sentence
Military sexual assault convictions destroy more than careers, they alter your entire life trajectory permanently. Understanding the full scope of consequences explains why experienced defense counsel is essential.
Criminal Penalties: Convictions can result in decades of confinement or life imprisonment. Every conviction risks punitive discharge, dishonorable or bad conduct, that strips you of the military identity you built throughout your service.
Financial Destruction: Courts-martial routinely impose total forfeiture of all pay and allowances. This means loss of base pay, housing allowance, subsistence, special pays, and bonuses. For many service members, this represents hundreds of thousands of dollars over a career. Retirement becomes impossible. Your family loses financial security immediately.
Veteran Benefits Eliminated: Dishonorable discharge makes you ineligible for all veteran benefits. GI Bill education benefits disappear. VA home loan guarantees vanish. VA healthcare access ends. Disability compensation becomes unavailable regardless of service-connected conditions.
Lifetime Sex Offender Registration: Most military sexual assault convictions trigger mandatory sex offender registration under federal and state law. Registration requires periodic in-person verification, restricts where you can live and work, appears on public databases, and follows you for life.
Employment Barriers: Sexual assault convictions create near-insurmountable employment barriers. Professional certifications and licenses become unattainable. Law enforcement careers, security positions, financial industry jobs, education sector positions, and healthcare careers remain permanently closed.
Family Law Consequences: State family courts consider convictions when determining custody and visitation rights. Many states create presumptions against custody for registered sex offenders.
Career Destruction Without Conviction: Even service members who are acquitted or have charges dismissed face career consequences. Investigation records appear during background checks. Commands initiate administrative separation based on "loss of confidence." Time away from duties stalls career progression. Many acquitted service members face continued hostility and separate voluntarily.
Your defense must begin the moment you're accused, not when charges are formally preferred, not at trial. By then, critical opportunities for evidence preservation and witness documentation have been lost forever.
Why Choose Joseph L. Jordan for Military Sexual Assault Defense
When your freedom and future face destruction, the attorney you choose determines the outcome. Joseph L. Jordan brings former military experience, proven courtroom success, and absolute commitment to defending service members worldwide.
Former Army JAG Officer: Joseph L. Jordan served as a Judge Advocate General's Corps officer, prosecuting and defending courts-martial before transitioning to civilian practice. This dual experience provides critical insider knowledge of prosecution strategies, command decision-making processes, military judge preferences, and panel member psychology.
Over a Decade of Exclusive Military Defense: Since establishing his practice, Joseph L. Jordan has dedicated his career exclusively to military defense. Hundreds of courts-martial at installations worldwide. Experience with all service branches and unified commands. Proven track record of acquittals, case dismissals, and successful administrative separation defenses.
24/7 Availability for Service Members Worldwide: Military investigations don't respect business hours or time zones. We provide 24/7 consultation for service members under investigation or facing charges. As an experienced military defense lawyer, Joseph L. Jordan responds immediately to ensure your rights are protected from the first moment. Initial consultations are confidential.
Independent Civilian Representation: Unlike appointed military counsel who serve within the chain of command, civilian defense counsel provide completely independent representation. We face no institutional pressures, no competing loyalties, no career consequences for aggressive advocacy. We can dedicate unlimited time to your case. Our sole obligation is to you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Do I really need a civilian military sexual assault attorney if I have appointed counsel?
A: Yes. Detailed defense counsel are competent JAG officers but operate within significant constraints: heavy caseloads with multiple simultaneous trials, service within the same chain of command as prosecutors, institutional pressures regarding career advancement, and inability to dedicate unlimited time to single cases. Civilian counsel work exclusively for you with no institutional pressures, unlimited time dedication, years of focused military defense experience, and often greater trial experience. You have the right to hire civilian counsel while retaining detailed defense counsel to work together. The most successful defenses typically involve both working as a team.
Q: Should I talk to investigators if they want to interview me?
A: No. Exercise your right to remain silent under Article 31 and immediately request counsel. Investigators use sophisticated interrogation techniques to elicit incriminating statements. They may suggest cooperation demonstrates innocence or that innocent people have nothing to hide. These tactics exploit your natural instinct to defend yourself. Nothing you say will prevent charges if command intends to prosecute. Statements cannot be withdrawn and will be used against you at trial. Politely decline to make any statement and immediately contact defense counsel.
Q: How long does a case take from accusation to resolution?
A: Timeline varies based on case complexity, installation caseload, and procedural motions. Investigation typically takes 2-6 months. After charges are preferred, preliminary hearings occur within 30-60 days. Court-martial referral and trial scheduling adds 3-6 months. Total timeline typically ranges from 8-18 months. Complex cases with extensive discovery disputes or expert witnesses may take longer. Administrative separation proceedings often run on parallel timelines.
Q: Can the military prosecute if the alleged victim doesn't want to press charges?
A: Yes. In military justice, alleged victims do not control whether charges are preferred. Commanders hold prosecutorial authority. However, current regulations require commanders to consult alleged victims before case disposition. While commanders retain final discretion, alleged victim preferences strongly influence outcomes. Commanders who dismiss charges over victim objections face institutional scrutiny. Cases rarely get dismissed when alleged victims want prosecution.
Q: What happens if I'm acquitted at court-martial?
A: Acquittal means the panel or military judge found the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. You cannot be prosecuted again under double jeopardy protections. However, acquittal does not necessarily end career challenges. Investigation records remain in databases and may affect security clearances. Commands may pursue administrative separation based on "loss of confidence." Career progression often stalls. Some service members face continued hostility and separate voluntarily despite acquittal.
Q: Will an investigation appear on background checks even if charges are never filed?
A: Yes, potentially. When investigators formally list you as a subject, your information enters NCIC databases. This entry can remain even if command takes no action. NCIC records appear during background checks for security clearances, federal employment, law enforcement positions, and some private sector jobs. Early legal intervention can sometimes prevent or limit these database entries.
Q: What should I do immediately after being accused?
A: First, exercise your right to remain silent with all investigators, commanders, and fellow service members. Second, contact civilian defense counsel immediately, consultations are confidential. Third, preserve all evidence including text messages, emails, social media, photographs, and documentation related to allegations or relationships. Fourth, identify potential witnesses. Fifth, document your timeline while memory remains fresh. Sixth, do not contact the alleged victim. Seventh, do not post about the case on social media. Every hour without proper legal representation increases risk of irreversible damage.
Your Defense Starts Now: Contact Us Immediately to Protect Your Rights
If you're under investigation for military sexual assault or facing charges, the decisions you make right now will determine whether you keep your career, your freedom, and your future or lose everything.
Former JAG Joseph L. Jordan has defended hundreds of service members worldwide. He knows the system from both sides. He knows how prosecutors think, how commanders decide, and how to win when the institution is stacked against you.
Call now for confidential consultation: (888) 643-6254
Available 24/7 for service members stationed anywhere in the world.
Don't wait until charges are preferred, by then, investigators have already built their case and critical evidence has been lost. Don't try to handle this alone, appointed counsel operates within the same system prosecuting you. Don't hope this goes away, it won't without aggressive defense from someone who answers only to you.
Contact us now. Your defense starts the moment we talk.
Related Military Defense Resources
- For rape-specific defense strategies and case law, see our Military Rape Defense page
- For comprehensive court-martial representation across all charges, visit our Court-Martial Defense Lawyer page
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Past case results do not guarantee future outcomes.
“I was a company commander falsely accused of sexual assault. I hired Mr. Jordan after being interrogated CID. Mr. Jordan informed me that I would very likely receive a GOMOR and to be patient and fight it during the rebuttal process. This seemed counter-intuitive to me but I put my trust in his advice and waited. After receiving the GOMOR, I worked very closely with one of his paralegals to gather statements, review material, and prepare a rebuttal. The end result was that I was rightly found innocent and the GOMOR was withdrawn and destroyed. God forbid that I ever need a lawyer in defense again while in the military, but if I do I would hire Mr. Jordan's firm without any hesitation.”
- JD
Contact Joseph L. Jordan, Attorney at Law today and schedule a consultation with our experienced and dedicated military defense lawyers today!