DISHONESTY LED TO MISTRIAL IN UNITED STATES V. COMMISSO
CAAF REVERSES US V. BRANTLEY, CALLING FOR REVIEW IN LIGHT OF US V. SAGER
U.S. V. REESE CHARGES REVERSED BY CAAF AFTER MAJOR CHANGE GOES UNADDRESSED
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces dismissed two charges in United States v. Reese, a Coast Guard case. The first was dismissed because it resulted from an improper major change to the charge during trial. The second was dismissed because the government had charged, as a novel Article 134 offense, conduct that […]
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS IN U.S. V. HALE CAUSE CONVICTION REVERSAL
UNLAWFUL COMMAND INFLUENCE MEANS A NEW TRIAL IN U.S. V. BOYCE
REVERSAL OF U.S. V. HENDRIX CONVICTION
NEW ACCA DECISION – MRE 513 (LK V. ACOSTA & RPI SFC SANCHEZ)
A THIRD FACA COMMITTEE CREATED OVERSEE MILITARY JUSTICE REGARDING SEX CRIMES
MRE 414 IN CHILD MOLESTATION CASES & HOW IT IMPACTED U.S. V. FETROW
RETIRED SERVICE MEMBERS ARE STILL SERVICE MEMBERS, SAYS NMCCA