BERGDAHL PROSECUTORS BARRED FROM USING WOUNDS
BERGDAHL “RESPONSIBLE FOR CERTAIN AMOUNT” OF DANGEROUS MISSIONS
ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS RE-EXAMINES HILLS DECISION
FEDERAL COURT VACATES MARINE DISCHARGE IN CONTROVERSIAL CASE
UNDERSTANDING “SEXTORTION” IN THE MILITARY
JSC CLARIFIES ARTICLE 134 DEFINITIONS, DISJUNCTIVES
HOW DOES TRUMP’S ELECTION AFFECT THE BERGDAHL CASE?
SENATOR MCCAIN’S COMMENTS DID NOT INFLUENCE BERGDAHL CASE
ARMY APPEALS COURT MAKES CONTROVERSIAL EVIDENCE RULING
MILITARY COURT: MANDATORY MINIMUMS APPLY TO ATTEMPTED SEX OFFENSES
