How do you start an investigation when a case lands on your desk?

When a case comes to me, I begin by thoroughly interviewing the client to gather their narrative. I ask them to write a detailed narrative, as written words often reveal more details. Using the Socratic method, I ask probing questions that lead to new inquiries. I focus on finding witnesses, evidence like social media data, text messages, or photographs, which can provide crucial insights into the case.

What are the signs that something isn’t adding up during an investigation?

During an investigation, I look for internal inconsistencies, external inconsistencies, and behavioral inconsistencies in witness statements. Internal inconsistencies occur when a person’s statements contradict themselves. External inconsistencies arise when a person gives different accounts to different individuals. Behavioral inconsistencies, like counterintuitive behavior, can reveal underlying motivations or intentions behind the allegations.

How far do you go in chasing down witnesses for a thorough investigation, especially when someone’s career is at stake?

In conducting a thorough investigation, I am willing to go the extra mile, even traveling to multiple states or remote locations for witness interviews. Sometimes, I personally hunt down witnesses in unconventional places like caves or remote beaches to gather crucial evidence. Going to great lengths to locate and interview witnesses is crucial to building a robust defense, especially when a client’s future is on the line.

How critical is the information uncovered outside the courtroom in shaping a strong defense strategy?

The information discovered outside the courtroom plays a pivotal role in shaping a strong defense strategy, accounting for at least 90% of a successful defense. Thorough preparation, including reviewing documentation, analyzing digital evidence, and interviewing witnesses, lays the foundation for a compelling defense. Understanding the evidence and leveraging expert insights are key elements in building a defense that can challenge the prosecution’s narrative effectively.

Can you share a case where your investigation uncovered crucial details that changed the trajectory of the case for your client?

In a case where my client initially confessed, further investigation revealed underlying psychological strain and manipulation. By delving into the client’s background, exploring inconsistencies in the alleged victim’s statements, and dissecting crucial evidence like apology notes, we proved a false confession. Thorough preparation, including putting the client on the stand to explain the inconsistencies, was pivotal in shifting the case’s direction and ultimately securing an acquittal.

For individuals under active investigation, what steps should they take to ensure a strong defense is built during the investigative phase?

Individuals under investigation should promptly seek legal counsel, refrain from deleting any potential evidence like texts or photographs, and safeguard all information for their defense attorney. It is crucial to exercise the right to remain silent, seek legal advice, and avoid speaking to investigators without an attorney present. Early collaboration with defense counsel, preserving evidence, and understanding one’s legal rights are essential in building a robust defense strategy and increasing the chances of a favorable outcome.