Ei Incumbit Probation Qui Dicit.

Proof lies on him who asserts, not on him who denies. The concept is that one is innocent until proven guilty. Regardless of what the law says about reasonable doubt, there is an unwritten presumption within the ranks of the military that if you are charged with sexual assault, then you are guilty. The stakes are your life! Your military counsel works for the same military that charged you. Consider that as you choose who represents you in your potentially life altering case.

We Are Committed To Serving You

Joseph L. Jordan, Attorney at Law travels across the globe to assist in military criminal defense matters.

Installations We Serve

Blog Posts in February, 2017

Acquittal Doesn't Rule Out All Facts, Affirms U.S. v. Rosario

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) ruled to reaffirm the Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals (CCA) decision of United States v. Rosario. The case ended in a conviction and ...
Continue reading "Acquittal Doesn't Rule Out All Facts, Affirms U.S. v. Rosario" »

Lack of Probable Cause Reverses Guilty Plea in U.S. v. Nieto

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) decided the appeal motion for United States v. Nieto recently. The case regarded a military investigator’s search authority and whether or not it ...
Continue reading "Lack of Probable Cause Reverses Guilty Plea in U.S. v. Nieto" »

Military Judge Calls Trump's Comments on Bergdahl "Disturbing"

The Bergdahl desertion case is currently up-in-the-air after the former-Sergeant Bergdahl’s defense attorneys argued a fair trial was now impossible due to repeated statements from Donald Trump ...
Continue reading "Military Judge Calls Trump's Comments on Bergdahl "Disturbing"" »

U.S. v. Muwwakkil: Missing Evidence Leads to Case Controversy

United States v. Muwwakkil represents a particularly interesting military defense case, in that an entire piece of evidence was stricken from the record due to the government’s negligence, and ...
Continue reading "U.S. v. Muwwakkil: Missing Evidence Leads to Case Controversy" »

U.S. v. Bowen Rehearing Authorized Due to Use of "Excited Utterance" Proof

The Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF) has concluded that United States v. Bowen was decided incorrectly due to the presiding judge’s abuse of discretion and erroneous judgement. ...
Continue reading "U.S. v. Bowen Rehearing Authorized Due to Use of "Excited Utterance" Proof" »

Bergdahl's Defense Attorneys: Trump Comments Make Fair Trial Impossible

Military prosecutors have promised to provide Bowe Bergdahl a fair trial after he was charged with desertion during a tour in Afghanistan. Concerns over the ability to grant Bergdahl an unbiased trial ...
Continue reading "Bergdahl's Defense Attorneys: Trump Comments Make Fair Trial Impossible" »

When Housebreaking Doesn't Require Walls or Ceilings

Today, our military criminal defense attorney takes a look at a recent case with a seemingly strange assertion (and the appeal that repaired it). This past Friday, Army Specialist (E-4) Nathan Wilson ...
Continue reading "When Housebreaking Doesn't Require Walls or Ceilings" »

As Featured In: